Skip to main content

Stevenson v. State

Citations

  • 149 A.3d 505
  • 2016 Del. LEXIS 533
  • 2016 WL 5937897

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that while the 11 Del. C. § 3507 statements were cumulative, they were admissible to rebut an express or implied charge of improper influence
  • finding waiver when defense counsel affirmatively agreed that the court’s redactions addressed his concerns for jury confusion
  • admitting videotaped statements pursuant to Delaware Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holland, Valihura, Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.