Seventh Circuit· 3/25/2010

Miller v. Herman

Citations

600 F.3d 726
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 6189
2010 WL 1068227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a court’s decision to exercise supplemental jurisdiction of a related state law claim is “squarely within its discretion”
holding that there was \no problem construing the motion [to dismiss] as one for summary judgment\ where the plaintiff \responded to the motions\ framed in the alternative \collectively and universally\
noting that the decision whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction is “squarely within [the district court’s] discretion”
noting that the decision whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction is “squarely within [the district court’s] discretion”
noting that \[t]he conflation of jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional limitations on causes of action is not an uncommon occurrence\
noting that a court may treat a motion filed under Rule 12(b)(1) as a Rule 12(b)(6) motion if warranted, and collecting cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Manion, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.