Skip to main content
· 5/21/2012

Cortezano v. Salin Bank & Trust Co.

Citations

  • 680 F.3d 936
  • 2012 WL 1814258
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10137
  • 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,509
  • 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, ordinarily, if all federal claims are dismissed before trial, district court “should relinquish jurisdiction over supplemental state law claims rather than resolve them on the merits”
  • “When the resolution of [the state- law] claims is clear, ... the court may choose to decide them.”
  • “When the resolution of [the state-law] claims is clear, . . . the court may choose to decide them.”
  • “Thus, national origin discrimination as defined in Title VII encompasses discrimination based on one’s ancestry, but not discrimination based on citizenship or immigration status.”
  • “when a court has dismissed all the federal claims in a lawsuit before trial, it should relinquish jurisdiction over supplemental state law claims rather than resolve them on the merits”
  • “Generally, when a court has dismissed all the federal claims in a lawsuit before trial, it should relinquish jurisdiction over supplemental state law claims rather than resolve them on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Posner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.