· 5/21/2012
Cortezano v. Salin Bank & Trust Co.
Citations
- 680 F.3d 936
- 2012 WL 1814258
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10137
- 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,509
- 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 77
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, ordinarily, if all federal claims are dismissed before trial, district court “should relinquish jurisdiction over supplemental state law claims rather than resolve them on the merits”
- “When the resolution of [the state- law] claims is clear, ... the court may choose to decide them.”
- “When the resolution of [the state-law] claims is clear, . . . the court may choose to decide them.”
- “Thus, national origin discrimination as defined in Title VII encompasses discrimination based on one’s ancestry, but not discrimination based on citizenship or immigration status.”
- “when a court has dismissed all the federal claims in a lawsuit before trial, it should relinquish jurisdiction over supplemental state law claims rather than resolve them on the merits”
- “Generally, when a court has dismissed all the federal claims in a lawsuit before trial, it should relinquish jurisdiction over supplemental state law claims rather than resolve them on the merits.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Posner, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.