Skip to main content
· 11/12/2003

Simeon Palay v. United States

Citations

  • 349 F.3d 418
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23083
  • 2003 WL 22659632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the discretionary-function exception does not apply where prison officials have \acted in direct contravention of BOP regulations\
  • concluding that the discretionary-function exception does not apply where prison officials have “acted in direct contravention of BOP regulations”
  • concluding that the discretionary function exception does not apply where prison officials have “acted in direct contravention of BOP regulations”
  • concluding that the discretionary-function exception does not apply where prison officials have “acted in direct contravention of BOP regulations”
  • holding that an agency is notified properly of a claim for purposes of the FTCA if the claim would have been apparent to a “legally sophisticated reader”
  • explaining that a claimant must provide “sufficient notice to enable the agency to investigate the claim” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Rovner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.