Carr v. Tillery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a federal court must bar refiling if a state court would, because state court judgments are owed full faith and credit
• finding that party acted deserving of sanctions when filed pleading “so lacking in merit . . . that its pursuit . . . indicates a motive to harass”
• noting that claim splitting “is barred by the doctrine of res judicata”
• finding that although the district court judge “jumped the gun” by dismissing the case under Rule 12(b)(6), the error was harmless since the court had all it needed to rule and the plaintiff did not object
• finding that although the district court judge “jumped the gun” by dismissing the case under Rule 12(b)(6), the error was harmless since the court had all it needed to rule and the plaintiff did not object
• finding that although the district court judge “jumped the gun” by dismissing the case under Rule 12(b)(6), the error was harmless since the court had all it needed to rule and the plaintiff did not object

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).