RWJ Management Co. v. BP Products North America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “when federal claims drop out of the case,” the trial court “has broad discretion to decide whether to ... relinquish supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims”—with a “general presumption in favor of relinquishment”
• stating that “when federal claims drop out of the case,” the trial court has “broad discretion to decide whether to … relinquish supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims”—with a “general presumption in favor of relinquishment”
• stating that “[w]hen federal claims drop out of the case,” the trial court has “broad discretion to decide whether to … relinquish supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims”—with a “general presumption in favor of relinquishment”
• explaining that “when federal claims drop out of the case,” the trial court “has broad discretion to decide whether to ... relinquish supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims”—with a “general presumption in favor of relinquishment”
• explaining that “[w]hen federal claims drop out of the case,” the trial court has “broad discretion to decide whether to ... relinquish supple- mental jurisdiction over the state-law claims”—with a “general presumption in favor of relinquishment”
• stating that “when federal claims drop out of the case,” the trial court has “broad discretion to decide whether to … relinquish supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims”—with a “gen- eral presumption in favor of relinquishment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).