Sixth Circuit· 3/22/1995

Miller v. Currie

Citations

50 F.3d 373
1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that a party’s objections to report and recommendation were general objections when they “were summary in nature, with no 2 Plaintiff cites L.R. 7.2(a)(1)(B
noting that objections should “be clear enough to enable the district court to discern those issues that are dispositive and contentions”
explaining that an ”objection to a magistrate’s report, which fails to specify the issues of contention, does not satisfy the requirement that an objection be filed”
finding that objections that allege the magistrate’s recommendation is incorrect, but “fail[ing] to specify the findings . . . believed [to be] in error” are overly general and improper
finding that objections that allege the magistrate’s recommendation is incorrect, but “fail[ing] to specify the findings . . . believed [to be] in error” are overly general and improper
finding that a party’s objections to report and recommendation were general objections when they “were summary in nature, with no specificity at all,” “failed specifically to address the findings of the magistrate,” at (E.D. Mich. Apr. 29, 2011

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.