Baab v. AMR Services Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs receipt of pornographic, explicit photographs, and sex toys in her locker was not intolerable in a civilized society and therefore not extreme or outrageous
• stating that co-workers’ display of photographs of scantily clad women and plaintiffs receipt of pornographic “sex toys” was not intolerable in a civilized society and therefore not extreme or outrageous
• stating that co-workers’ display of photographs of scantily clad women and plaintiffs receipt of pornographic “sex toys” was not intolerable in a civilized society and therefore not extreme or outrageous
• stating that co-workers’ display of photographs of scantily clad women and plaintiffs receipt of pornographic “sex toys” was not intolerable in a civilized society and therefore not extreme or outrageous
• making the observation: “[t]o say that Ohio courts narrowly define ‘extreme and outrageous conduct’ would be something of an understatement”
• “[T]o say that Ohio courts narrowly define ‘extreme and outrageous conduct’ would be something of an understatement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).