Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/5/1951
Gleitz, III, a Minor v. Gleitz, Sr.
Citations
- 98 N.E.2d 74
- 88 Ohio App. 337
- 59 Ohio Law. Abs. 186
- 45 Ohio Op. 140
- 1951 Ohio App. LEXIS 724
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[N]o such action [seeking recovery by minor for loss of the affection, companionship, guidance and care of his father] was known to the common law, and there is in Ohio no statutory authority for the maintenance of such an action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, Hunsicker, Doyle, Eighth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Miller v. CurrieSixth Circuit· 1995-03-22· cited 994×
- Bennight v. Western Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-04-04· cited 46×
- Kane v. QuigleyOhio Supreme Court· 1964-12-29· cited 27×
- Wallace v. WallaceWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1971-11-02· cited 19×
- Stovell v. JamesDistrict of Columbia· 2011-09-14· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.