Skip to main content

Michael v. State

Citations

  • 115 P.3d 517
  • 2005 Alas. LEXIS 78
  • 2005 WL 1369030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is a question of law whether given facts establish a statutory mitigating factor
  • holding that the correct standard of review for the application of statutory aggravating and mitigating factors is de novo review
  • holding that it is a question of law-i.e., a question to be decided by an appellate court without deference to the sentencing judge-whether given facts establish the miti-gator of conduct \among the least serious\
  • suggesting that, under a given set of facts, an appellate court should exercise de novo review of a sentencing judge’s rulings on aggravating and mitigating factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fare, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.