Alaska Supreme Court· 8/7/1998

In re J.A.

Citations

962 P.2d 173
1998 Alas. LEXIS 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

in determining whether a child is in need of aid, the court gives deference to factual findings but reviews the legal determination of whether probable cause exists under a de novo standard
in determining whether a child is in need of aid, the court gives deference to factual findings but reviews the legal determination of whether probable cause exists under a de novo standard
probable cause determination in CIÑA case is reviewed de novo in part to avoid permitting different trial judges from drawing different conclusions as to whether the facts are sufficient to constitute probable cause
probable cause determination in CINA case is reviewed de novo in part to avoid permitting different trial judges from drawing different conclusions as to whether the facts are sufficient to constitute probable cause
equating preponderance of the evidence with “more likely than not”
appeal from probable cause determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Compton, Eastaugh, Fabe, Matthews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.