Skip to main content
· 3/7/2002

United States v. Dereck Ricardo Hoskins

Citations

  • 282 F.3d 772
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2175
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 2701
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3587
  • 2002 WL 356301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a store security guard who needed permission to take a bathroom break lacked any “professional or managerial discretion,” and also that the “two Hill indicia are noticeably absent”
  • noting that a store security guard who needed permis- sion to take a bathroom break lacked any “professional or managerial discretion,” and also that the “two Hill indicia are noticeably absent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Cudahy, McKeown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.