HOEKZEMA v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that because the judge \offered no explanation for his ruling\ in favor of the State on a sentencing issue, the reviewing court \presume[s] that the judge adopted the prosecutor's argument\
• “[The judge] offered no explanation for his ruling. We therefore presume that the judge adopted the prosecutor’s argument . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).