Skip to main content

Simants v. State

Citations

  • 329 P.3d 1033
  • 2014 WL 2993544
  • 2014 Alas. App. LEXIS 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial courts must subject probation conditions implicating constitutional rights to special scrutiny and “affirmatively consider, and have good reason for rejecting, any less restrictive alternatives”
  • holding that “the constitutional importance of a person’s right to maintain familial relationships” required trial court to affirmatively demonstrate that the defendant was a danger to her children before restricting familial contact as a condition of probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mannheimer, Allard, Hanley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.