Howard Dean Rouse v. Dennis L. Benson David Crist Steve C. Hokonson Timothy Lanz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that restrictions on state prisoner’s practice of his Native American religion did not violate his equal-protection rights because he failed to present “any evidence showing that other inmates following other religions have not been similarly limited”
• holding that restrictions on state prisoner’s practice of his Native American religion did not violate his equal-protection rights because he failed to present “any evidence showing that other inmates following other religions have not been similarly limited”
• holding that restrictions on state prisoner’s practice of his Native American religion did not violate his equal-protection rights because he failed to present “any evidence showing that other inmates following other religions have not been similarly limited”
• holding that restrictions on state prisoner’s practice of his Native American religion did not violate his equal-protection rights because he failed to present “any evidence showing that other inmates following other religions have not been similarly limited”
• holding that restrictions on state prisoner’s practice of his Native American religion did not violate his equal-protection rights because he failed to present “any evidence showing that other inmates following other religions have not been similarly limited”
• holding that restrictions on state prisoner’s practice of his Native American religion did not violate his equal-protection rights because he failed to present “any evidence showing that other inmates following other religions have not been similarly limited”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).