Lazaridis v. Wehmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “motion [that] advanced the same arguments that were in [appellant’s] complaint and motions ... [was] not a proper basis for reconsideration”
• holding that advancing same arguments previously presented in party’s complaint and motion “is not a proper basis for reconsideration”
• concluding that the district court appropriately denied a motion for reconsideration where the moving party advanced the same arguments that were in his complaint and motions
• holding abstention appropriate where plaintiff brought due process challenge to registration and enforcement of French custody order in Delaware state court
• holding abstention appropriate where plaintiff brought due process challenge to registration and enforcement of French custody order in Delaware state court
• stating that the standard of review for a 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) dismissal is plenary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).