Seventh Circuit· 7/23/2012
Michael A. Willis v. William J. Lep
Citations
- 687 F.3d 826
- 83 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 352
- 2012 WL 2989253
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15061
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the standard for a new trial under Rule 59(a) is “substantially similar to Rule 60(b)(3)’s ‘fully-and-fairly’ standard” and concluding that “the district court did not err in examining the two motions together”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Paul Eichwedel v. Brad CurrySeventh Circuit· 2012-08-29· cited 262×
- Delores Henry v. Melody HulettSeventh Circuit· 2020-08-11· cited 262×
- Jeremy Venson v. Lazaro AltamiranoSeventh Circuit· 2014-04-18· cited 123×
- Johnson v. General Board of Pension & Health Benefits of the United Methodist ChurchSeventh Circuit· 2013-10-21· cited 97×
- Marque Bowers v. Thomas DartSeventh Circuit· 2021-06-16· cited 96×
- Markith Williams v. Christopher DieballSeventh Circuit· 2013-08-01· cited 60×
- Devaris Perry v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2013-10-23· cited 53×
- Ponzini v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-08-30· cited 42×
- Sara Lesende v. Arnold BorreroThird Circuit· 2014-05-15· cited 41×
- Hardy v. City of MilwaukeeE.D. Wisconsin· 2015-02-27· cited 13×
- Merix Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Clinical Supplies Management, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2015-05-27· cited 10×
- Smego v. MitchellSeventh Circuit· 2016-05-16· cited 4×
- Gracia v. Sigmatron International, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2015-04-21· cited 3×
- Porch-Clark v. EngelhartSeventh Circuit· 2013-12-10· cited 2×
- Betker v. City of MilwaukeeE.D. Wisconsin· 2014-05-19· cited 1×
- Caiarelli v. Taylor (In re Taylor)N.D. Illinois· 2017-07-17· cited 1×
- Yongping Zhou v. BelangerSeventh Circuit· 2013-06-27· cited 1×
- Guice v. WinklerSeventh Circuit· 2013-01-23· cited 1×
- Lake v. FlaggS.D. Illinois· 2017-03-28· cited 1×
- Knapp v. Evgeros, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2017-08-21· cited 1×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Soltys v. CostelloSeventh Circuit· 2008-03-25· cited 190×
- Mary Dickerson v. Board of Education of Ford Heights, IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1994-08-12· cited 148×
- Mejia v. Cook County, Ill.Seventh Circuit· 2011-04-22· cited 137×
- Lorain Tolliver v. Northrop CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1986-03-14· cited 109×
- Kunz v. DeFeliceSeventh Circuit· 2008-08-14· cited 106×
- Wickens v. Shell Oil Co.Seventh Circuit· 2010-08-31· cited 88×
- Elizabeth Marshall v. Porter County Plan CommissionSeventh Circuit· 1994-09-30· cited 84×
- Pickett v. SHERIDAN HEALTH CARE CENTERSeventh Circuit· 2010-06-25· cited 83×
- John P. Miksis v. Henry L. Howard and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1997-02-10· cited 74×
- Chlopek v. Federal InsuranceSeventh Circuit· 2007-08-28· cited 73×
- Moore Ex Rel. Estate of Grady v. TueljaSeventh Circuit· 2008-10-06· cited 55×
- Daniel Latino and Robert Slawinski v. Edward Kaizer and City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1995-07-12· cited 54×
- Starlett King and Jeff Shetterly v. Brian HarringtonSeventh Circuit· 2006-05-09· cited 54×
- John F. Belom v. National Futures Association and Joy JuSeventh Circuit· 2002-03-28· cited 52×
- United States v. Walter Berry, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 1996-08-16· cited 46×
- Mark Wiedemann v. Dr. Jaime Alberto GalianoSeventh Circuit· 1983-11-18· cited 39×
- Joseph Baptist, Richard Brooks, Price Dumas, Willie Hunt, and Lamont Upton v. City of Kankakee and Mike KinkadeSeventh Circuit· 2007-03-26· cited 31×
- Bogan v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2011-07-06· cited 29×
- Musch v. Domtar Industries, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2009-11-25· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.