Markith Williams v. Christopher Dieball

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that failure to object to opposing counsel’s inflammatory statements describing evidence during opening statement waived argument on appeal
• reasoning that “to find that one party’s argument was preserved because his opponent defended against it out of an abundance of caution would be to punish the opponent for being more thorough”
• “even arguments that have been raised may still be waived on appeal if they are underdeveloped, conclusory, or unsupport‐ ed by law”
• “[A] party who fails to adequately present an issue to the district court has waived the issue for purposes of appeal.”
• “[A] party may not raise an issue for the first time on appeal.” (citation omitted)
• “[A] party may not raise an issue for the first time on appeal.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).