Jeremy Venson v. Lazaro Altamirano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• looking for some combination of errors, whereas the Court has not identified errors in this case
• by failing to object at the time, defendant waived argument that counsel's remarks during closing argument violated district court's motion in limine
• “With probable cause to arrest [plaintiff], the officers were entitled to conduct a search of his person (including, for example, his pockets) incident to arrest.”
• Court rejecting argument that Plaintiff was prejudiced by improper statements made during closing because Plaintiff had an opportunity to rebut Defendants
• \A new trial is appropriate if the jury's verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence or if the trial was in some way unfair to the moving party.\
• “A new trial is appropriate if the jury’s verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence or if the trial was in some way unfair to the moving party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).