Skip to main content
· 8/14/2008

Kunz v. DeFelice

Citations

  • 538 F.3d 667
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17227
  • 2008 WL 3483442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the plaintiff “was shackled and defenseless while he was being punched and thus vulnerable to the injury inflicted”
  • warning that there is “considerable danger that evidence that a witness has used illegal drugs may so prejudice the jury that it will excessively discount the witness’ testimony”
  • explaining that evidence of drug use may be used to impeach a witness’s recollection of events but not for the impermissible “inference that drug users tend to lie”
  • explaining that evidence of drug use may be used to impeach a witness's recollection of events but not for the impermissible “inference that drug users tend to lie”
  • explaining that evidence of drug use may be used to impeach a witness’s recollection of events but not for the impermissible “inference that drug users tend to lie”
  • recounting the plaintiffs actions of delivering drugs, driving a stolen vehicle while drunk, and fleeing the police, all of which necessitated the plaintiffs arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Flaum, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.