· 8/14/2008
Kunz v. DeFelice
Citations
- 538 F.3d 667
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17227
- 2008 WL 3483442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the plaintiff “was shackled and defenseless while he was being punched and thus vulnerable to the injury inflicted”
- warning that there is “considerable danger that evidence that a witness has used illegal drugs may so prejudice the jury that it will excessively discount the witness’ testimony”
- explaining that evidence of drug use may be used to impeach a witness’s recollection of events but not for the impermissible “inference that drug users tend to lie”
- explaining that evidence of drug use may be used to impeach a witness's recollection of events but not for the impermissible “inference that drug users tend to lie”
- explaining that evidence of drug use may be used to impeach a witness’s recollection of events but not for the impermissible “inference that drug users tend to lie”
- recounting the plaintiffs actions of delivering drugs, driving a stolen vehicle while drunk, and fleeing the police, all of which necessitated the plaintiffs arrest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Flaum, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.