Chlopek v. Federal Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the intent or motive behind a measure is irrelevant
• concluding that the intent or motive behind a measure is irrelevant
• noting that there is a “strong presumption that juries follow instructions” (citing 3M v. Pribyl, 259 F.3d 587, 600 (7th Cir. 2001)
• finding no abuse of discretion in district court’s determination that evidence of a changed warning label was excludable as unfairly prejudicial
• finding no abuse of discretion in district court’s determination that evidence of a changed warning label was excludable as unfairly prej- udicial
• If “one of [Rule 42(b)’s] criteria is met, the district court may order bifurcation . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).