Skip to main content
· 3/21/2011

Ruffin Hotel Corp. v. Gasper

Citations

  • 17 A.3d 676
  • 418 Md. 594
  • 2011 Md. LEXIS 202
  • 111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Title VII precedent “does not comport with Maryland law”
  • finding that Title VII precedent “does not comport with Maryland law”
  • refusing to grant an employer immunity under the MWCA when an employee lodged a negligent hiring/retention claim against her employer as a result of intentional and unlawful misconduct of a fellow employee
  • “It is frequently stated that the issue of whether a particular item of evidence should be admitted or excluded is committed to the considerable and sound discretion of the trial court____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Harrell, Greene, Murphy, Adkins, Barbera, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.