Mersmann v. Continental Airlines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a fraudulent joinder argument in which supervisor was “alleged to be the person who investigated the accusations against [the plaintiff] and ultimately terminated her”
• finding no fraudulent joinder of the plaintiff’s colleague “in light of the heavy burden upon the removing party to show that joinder occurred for improper reasons,” without analyzing the merits of the plaintiff’s NJLAD claim against the colleague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).