International Ass'n of MacHinists v. Central Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Act reflects a “steady congressional intent to move toward a reliable and effective system for the settlement of grievances”
• holding union had federal cause of action to enforce award of airline adjustment board included in collective bargaining contract pursuant to Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 184
• holding that the RLA authorizes federal courts to enforce airline board of adjustment awards, notwithstanding the fact that this authority is not expressly articulated in § 184, and directing courts to construe § 184 in light of the statute as a whole, including § 153
• holding that the RLA authorizes federal courts to enforce airline board of adjustment awards, notwithstanding the fact that this authority is not expressly articulated in § 184, and directing courts to construe § 184 in light of the statute as a whole, including § 153
• discussing history of requirement that air carriers and their employees establish boards of adjustment to resolve disputes arising out of existing contracts
• explaining history of system boards for airline industry under RLA and role of neutral arbitrator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).