Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that preemption under § 514(a) does not permit removal when the plaintiff's state claim falls without the scope of ERISA's civil remedy provisions
• holding that preemption under § 514(a) does not permit removal when the plaintiff's state claim falls without the scope of ERISA's civil remedy provisions
• concluding that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over a lawsuit brought by state tax authorities for a declaratory judgment involving an ERISA-covered employee benefit plan
• holding that ERISA did not preempt a state law cause of action outside the scope of § 502(a)
• holding that ERISA preemption without more does not convert a state claim into an action arising under federal law
• holding that “federal courts should not entertain suits by the States to declare the validity of their regulations despite possibly conflicting federal law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).