Antol v. Esposto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s state law wage claim was preempted because the “suit [was] based ‘squarely on the terms of the collective bargaining agreement’”
• finding pre-emption of plaintiff's Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law claims because the “suit [was] based ‘squarely on the terms of the collective bargaining agreement’
• finding pre-emption of plaintiff's Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law claims because the “suit [was] based ‘squarely on the terms of the collective bargaining agreement’
• discussing the need for uniformity in the interpretation of collective bargaining agreements
• finding pre- emption of plaintiff's Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law claims because the “suit [was] based ‘squarely on the terms of the collective bargaining agreement’
• state law wage statute claim was contract-based and thus subject to federal preemption based on CBA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).