Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that preemption of \derivative\ tort claims is necessary to \preserve the central role of arbitration in our 'system of industrial self-government' \
• holding that § 301 preempts state claims substantially involving application of a labor contract between an employer and a union representing employees
• holding that only state law claims that are “inextricably intertwined with considerations of the terms of the labor contract” are preempted by § 301
• holding that § 301 does not preempt state law claims based on non-negotiable, independent rights
• holding that preemption of \derivative” tort claims is necessary to \preserve the central role of arbitration in our ‘system of industrial self-government’”
• holding that Section 301 completely preempts any state-law “tort claim ... inextricably intertwined with consideration of the terms of [a] labor contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).