Indiana Supreme Court· 12/23/1997
Davenport v. State
Citations
- 689 N.E.2d 1226
- 1997 Ind. LEXIS 232
- 1997 WL 795992
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the presentence investigation report specifically detailed the defendant's juvenile charges and true findings and the trial court properly used this as evidence of criminal activity and as an aggravating factor
- although witness contradicted his pre-trial statements, his testimony was not incredibly dubious because he did not contradict himself while testifying
- although witness contradicted his pre-trial statements, his testimony was not incredibly dubious because he did not contradict himself while testifying
- “the State received an adverse ruling in the original trial court on its motion to amend the information.... Because of a sleight of hand, the State was able to escape the ruling of the original court and pursue the case on the charges the State had sought to add belatedly”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selby, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- K.S. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 327×
- Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-01-25· cited 148×
- Troy Shaw v. Bill WilsonSeventh Circuit· 2013-07-24· cited 123×
- Mendoza v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-07-13· cited 74×
- Murray v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-24· cited 60×
- Hildebrandt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-06-07· cited 44×
- Allen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-01-19· cited 40×
- Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-11-13· cited 39×
- Beason v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-01-13· cited 38×
- Fisher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-28· cited 35×
- Casady v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-09-28· cited 33×
- Wingate v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-01-30· cited 28×
- Simmons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-03-15· cited 23×
- Davenport v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-07-28· cited 22×
- State v. KleinIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-12-10· cited 16×
- Boss v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-12-11· cited 13×
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-11-21· cited 13×
- Westmoreland v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-05-09· cited 13×
- Graham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-06-18· cited 12×
- Jimmerson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-06-13· cited 11×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Joyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 217×
- Fugate v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-02-12· cited 161×
- Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-05-24· cited 140×
- Mitchem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-09-05· cited 132×
- Widener v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-28· cited 125×
- Kingery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-22· cited 115×
- Morgan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 115×
- Tillman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-11-04· cited 99×
- Edgecomb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-11-01· cited 98×
- Jordan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-09-01· cited 97×
- Bradford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-12· cited 75×
- Evans v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-10-03· cited 72×
- Burdine v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-12-02· cited 68×
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 68×
- Rodgers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 68×
- Willoughby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-03-26· cited 63×
- Angleton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-09· cited 51×
- Campbell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 44×
- Day v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-10-10· cited 43×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.