Skip to main content
· 11/13/2013

David Williams v. State of Indiana

Citations

  • 997 N.E.2d 1154
  • 2013 WL 6001892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the police officers’ statements that they wished to help defendant and his daughter were not implied promises of leniency
  • holding that even if the trial court abused its discretion by considering the defendant’s IRAS score, remand was unnecessary where the court concluded the sentence imposed was not inappropriate
  • holding that even if the trial court abused its discretion by considering the defendant’s IRAS score, remand was unnecessary where the court concluded the sentence imposed was not inappropriate
  • observing that a trial court does not have to explain why it does not find that a factor is a mitigating circumstance
  • remand for resentencing unnecessary where appellate court concludes the sentence imposed was not inappropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Najam, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.