Skip to main content

Melendez v. State

Citations

  • 718 So. 2d 746
  • 1998 WL 306759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying newly discovered evidence claim because evidence presented was unlikely to change the verdict where the jury had already rejected the same defense theory
  • “As long as the trial court's finding are supported by competent substantial evidence, ‘this Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, . . . .’” (quoting Blanco v. State, 702 So. 2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.