State v. Larzelere

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Prejudice is presumed where an actual conflict is shown to have adversely affected a client’s representation.”
• “Prejudice is presumed where an actual - 15 - conflict is shown to have adversely affected a client’s representation.”
• claim that prosecutor’s arguments constructively amended or varied from indictment should have been raised on direct appeal
• “A situation in which the attorney’s own interests diverge from those of the client presents the same core problem presented in the multiple representation cases: the attorney’s fealty to the client is compromised.”
• “Larzelere has not shown counsel to be ineffective for not calling a concrete expert because she had not demonstrated what an individual qualified as a concrete expert would have testified to in this case or how such testimony would cast doubt on her guilt.”
• “Larzelere has not shown counsel to be ineffective for not calling a concrete expert because she had not demonstrated what an individual qualified as a concrete expert would have testified to in this case or how such testimony would cast doubt on her guilt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).