Skip to main content

Armstrong v. State

Citations

  • 852 S.E.2d 824
  • 310 Ga. 598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to seek a limiting instruction regarding the purpose for which evidence was admitted under OCGA § 24-4-404 (b), because the appellant did not show that the absence of the instruction probably affected the outcome of his trial
  • explaining that “’the prosecutorial need for the other acts evidence showing gang membership was high’ because, without it, it is unclear what motive [appellant] would have had to shoot [victim] in a crowded park”
  • rejecting claim of plain error in jury charge where appellant “makes only conclusory arguments about 23 harm”
  • evidence of defendant's gang membership relevant, admissible, and not unduly prejudicial because it explained motive actuating otherwise senseless shooting
  • evidence that the defendant and co- defendants were gang members, along with expert testimony that defiance is seen as disrespect in gang culture, showed motive for the shooting
  • “Although evidence of gang membership can be highly prejudicial, all inculpatory evidence is inherently prejudicial; it is only when unfair prejudice substantially outweighs probative value that the rule permits exclusion.” (cleaned up; emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.