Second Circuit· 11/28/2007

Patane v. Clark

Citations

508 F.3d 106
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 27391
90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,025
102 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 171
2007 WL 4179838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that discriminatory treatment is actionable “only when it occurs because of an employee’s sex, or other protected characteristic”
holding that such allegations are “legally insufficient under 12(b)(6)” to allege a retaliatory employment action
noting that the adverse employment actions alleged in the complaint were characterized by the-plaintiff as retaliatory
finding that regularly subjection to pornographic videos in the workplace constituted sufficient facts to defeat motion to dismiss
stating that hostile work environment claim under Title VII requires showing \that the complained of conduct ... is objectively severe or pervasive\
stating that “sine qua non of a gender-based discriminatory action claim under Title VII is that the discrimination must be became of sex” (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Wesley, Brieant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

249 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Patane v. Clark

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.