Patterson v. County of Oneida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the challenge to “continued post removal order detention is premature” where the detainee “has not been in post-removal-order detention longer than the presumptively reasonable six month period[.]”
• although 90-day period had expired, challenge to detention was premature because Petitioner had not been in post-removal-order custody more than six months
• although 90-day period had expired, challenge to detention was premature because Petitioner had not been in post-removal-order custody more than six months
• although 90-day period had expired, challenge to detention was premature because petitioner had not been in post- removal-order custody more than six months
• “It is presumptively constitutional for an alien to be detained for six months after a final order of removal.”
• “It is presumptively constitutional for an alien to be detained for six months after a final order of removal.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).