Skip to main content

McGibney v. Rauhauser

Citations

  • 549 S.W.3d 816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that billing entries stating “[r]eview [Redacted]” and “[r]eview and respond [Redacted]” were “so heavily redacted as to be meaningless”
  • holding trial court abused discretion in awarding TCPA movant fees for legal work performed on “a different case”
  • vacating $150,000 sanction as excessive and impermissibly punitive; “meager” evidence of deterrence
  • trial court abuses discretion by awarding TCPA attorney’s fees for legal work performed on “a different case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sudderth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.