Skip to main content
· 4/23/2004

Cire v. Cummings

Citations

  • 134 S.W.3d 835
  • 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 465
  • 2004 Tex. LEXIS 366
  • 2004 WL 877538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court.\must analyze the available sanctions and offer a reasoned explanation as to the appropriateness of the sanction imposed\
  • holding that the trial court ″must analyze the available sanctions and offer a reasoned explanation as to the appropriateness of the sanction imposed″
  • holding that “death penalty” sanctions of dismissing plaintiff’s claim was warranted because of plaintiff’s failure to produce audiotapes that would have proved or disproved plaintiff’s legal malpractice claims
  • holding that death-penalty sanctions were justified by plaintiff’s repeated refusal to produce critical audiotapes needed to dispute plaintiff’s claim, by later destroying those tapes, and by misrepresenting the circumstances to the trial court
  • holding that death penalty sanctions were justified by plaintiff’s repeated refusal to produce critical audiotapes needed to dispute plaintiff’s claim, by later destroying those tapes, and by misrepresenting the circumstances to the trial court
  • holding that party’s ″deliberate[]″ destruction of relevant evidence justified death-penalty sanctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schneider

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.