Unifund CCR Partners v. Villa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court’s plenary power had not expired where order granting nonsuit was not final because it did not dispose of all pending matters
• holding that deadline for expiration of plenary power does not begin to run absent final order disposing of all pending matters
• holding that deadline for expiration of plenary power does not begin to run absent final order disposing of all pending matters
• holding that trial court’s plenary power had not expired where order granting nonsuit was not final because it did not dispose of all pending matters
• holding that trial court could have timely awarded sanctions to defendant, notwithstanding its lack of jurisdiction over bankruptcy issues, because request for sanctions was governed by state statute—not by any statute whose jurisdiction is vested exclusively in federal court
• stating that trial court does not abuse its discretion if it bases its decision on conflicting evidence and some evidence supports decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).