Texas Supreme Court· 1/21/2011

Molinet v. Kimbrell

Citations

356 S.W.3d 407
54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 491
2011 Tex. LEXIS 68
2011 WL 182230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the limitations provisions of section 74.251(a) and section 33.004(e) conflict and that section 74.251(a) prevails
holding that this Court construes \clear and unambiguous statutes according to the language actually enacted and published as law\
holding that a “notwithstanding any other law” provision evidenced clear legislative intent to resolve any interpretation conflicts in favor of the statute containing the provision
concluding that statutory limitations period in TMLA controlled over conflicting limitations period in the civil practice and remedies code
holding that a \notwithstanding any other law\ provision evidenced clear legislative intent to resolve any interpretation conflicts in favor of the statute containing the provision
holding that a “notwithstanding any other law” provision evidenced clear legislative intent to resolve any interpretation conflicts in favor of the statute containing the provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, Guzman, Hecht, Jefferson, Johnson, Lehrmann, Medina, Wainwright, Willett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

339 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.