Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/19/1987

Hewitt v. Helms

Citations

  • 482 U.S. 755
  • 107 S. Ct. 2672
  • 96 L. Ed. 2d 654
  • 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2726
  • 55 U.S.L.W. 4907
  • 44 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff must “receive at least some relief on the merits of his claim before he can be said to prevail”
  • holding that a plaintiff must \receive at least some relief on the merits of his claim before he can be said to prevail\
  • holding that a plaintiff must “receive at least some relief on the merits of his claim before he can be said to prevail”
  • holding that the judicial pronouncement must settle a dispute \which affects the behavior of the defendant towards the plaintiff\
  • holding that, in a § 1983 action for alleged due process violations, the plaintiff was not a prevailing party for purposes of § 1988(b
  • holding that an interlocutory ruling that reverses a dismissal for failure to state a claim “is not the stuff of which legal victories are made”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scalia, Rehnquist, White, Powell, O'Connor, Marshall, Brennan, Blackmun, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

662 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.