Supreme Court· 1/18/1943
Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.
Citations
- 317 U.S. 564
- 63 S. Ct. 332
- 87 L. Ed. 460
- 1943 U.S. LEXIS 1207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that goods remain in interstate commerce where there is a practical continuity of movement
- holding that a dairy delivery driver who delivered products 18 intrastate only transported goods in interstate commerce and was exempt under the MCA exemption
- holding that “[i]f a substantial part of an employee’s activities related to goods whose movement in the channels of interstate commerce was established by the test we have described, he is covered by the [FLSA]”
- holding that individual coverage is established “[i]f a substantial part of an employee’s activities related to goods whose movement in the channels of interstate commerce was established by the test we have described, he is covered by the [FLSA]”
- holding that individual coverage is established “[i]f a substantial part of an employee’s activities related to goods whose movement in the channels of interstate commerce was established by the test we have described, he is covered by the [FLSA]”
- explaining that an employee operates in interstate commerce where “a substantial part” of his work related to goods traveling in interstate commerce
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
459 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1953-06-08· cited 1,757×
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 1,180×
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court· 1945-03-26· cited 556×
- Maryland v. WirtzSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 526×
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court· 1943-06-07· cited 373×
- Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & AssociatesSupreme Court· 1959-01-12· cited 332×
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court· 1946-04-29· cited 312×
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court· 1943-02-01· cited 304×
- Commissioner v. Estate of ChurchSupreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 281×
- Miller v. BrownFourth Circuit· 2006-08-30· cited 237×
- United States v. Employing Plasterers Assn. of ChicagoSupreme Court· 1954-03-08· cited 225×
- Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Co.Supreme Court· 1946-02-11· cited 218×
- Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.Supreme Court· 1955-06-06· cited 214×
- Roland Electrical Co. v. WallingSupreme Court· 1946-01-28· cited 199×
- Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court· 1951-01-08· cited 195×
- Mitchell v. H. B. Zachry Co.Supreme Court· 1960-04-04· cited 151×
- 10 East 40th Street Building, Inc. v. CallusSupreme Court· 1945-06-11· cited 128×
- Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Supreme Court· 1955-05-23· cited 104×
- Michael Bilyou, Individually & on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Dutchess Beer Distributors, Inc.Second Circuit· 2002-08-07· cited 101×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.