Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 1/18/1943

Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.

Citations

  • 317 U.S. 564
  • 63 S. Ct. 332
  • 87 L. Ed. 460
  • 1943 U.S. LEXIS 1207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that goods remain in interstate commerce where there is a practical continuity of movement
  • holding that a dairy delivery driver who delivered products 18 intrastate only transported goods in interstate commerce and was exempt under the MCA exemption
  • holding that “[i]f a substantial part of an employee’s activities related to goods whose movement in the channels of interstate commerce was established by the test we have described, he is covered by the [FLSA]”
  • holding that individual coverage is established “[i]f a substantial part of an employee’s activities related to goods whose movement in the channels of interstate commerce was established by the test we have described, he is covered by the [FLSA]”
  • holding that individual coverage is established “[i]f a substantial part of an employee’s activities related to goods whose movement in the channels of interstate commerce was established by the test we have described, he is covered by the [FLSA]”
  • explaining that an employee operates in interstate commerce where “a substantial part” of his work related to goods traveling in interstate commerce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

459 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.