McCampbell v. KPMG Peat Marwick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff could not recover against attorney representing opposing party in previous suit based on attorney’s allegedly false statements in affidavit and motion for new trial filed in that suit
• holding that plaintiff could not recover against attorney representing opposing party in previous suit based on attorney’s allegedly false statements in affidavit and motion for new trial filed in that suit
• holding plaintiff could not recover against attorney representing opposing party in previous suit based on attorney’s allegedly false statements in affidavit and new-trial motion
• holding that the plaintiff, who sued the law firm that had represented the opposing party in a previous lawsuit, could not recover against the law firm for the law firm’s allegedly false statements in an affidavit and motion for new trial filed in the previous suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).