Martin v. Trevino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that the special injury requirement is \outmoded in today's society” and opining that \the general policy reasons for adopting the special damage rule in Texas remain viable today”
• rejecting argument that the special injury requirement is “outmoded in today’s society” and opining that “the general policy reasons for adopting the special damage rule in Texas remain viable today”
• “[T]he violation by an attorney of the disciplinary rules adopted by the Texas Supreme Court does not of itself create a private cause of action.”
• “[T]he violation by an attorney of the disciplinary rules adopted by the Texas Supreme Court does not of itself create a private cause of action.”
• “[T]he violation by an attorney of the disciplinary rules adopted by the Texas Supreme Court does not of itself create a private cause of action.”
• noting “process” to be “incident to litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).