Skip to main content
· 3/3/1999

Hamm v. Hiler (In Re Smyth)

Citations

  • 242 B.R. 352
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18375
  • 1999 WL 1244000

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Edwards “indicate[s] that the dicta in Foval may no longer hold true”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orlando L. Garcia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.