Bradt v. West

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judge had jurisdiction, for judicial immunity purposes, to sign order even if that order would be determined void because motion to recuse judge was pending
• holding that judge had jurisdiction, for judicial immunity purposes, to sign an order even if that order would be determined void due to pending motion to recuse judge
• holding that judge had jurisdiction, for judicial immunity purposes, to sign an order even if that order would be determined void due to pending motion to recuse judge
• holding claims for conspiracy to maliciously prosecute, malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference with contractual relations, liability under the Texas Tort Claims Act, and abuse of process were barred as a matter of law
• stating that, for example, attorney could not be sued by opposing party for filing meritless or frivolous motions, \because making motions is conduct an attorney engages in as part of the discharge of his duties in representing a party in a lawsuit\
• stating that, for example, attorney could not be sued by opposing party for filing meritless or frivolous motions, “because making motions is conduct an attorney engages in as part of the discharge of his duties in representing a party in a lawsuit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).