W.O. Akin v. Q-L Investments, Inc., Etc., Laventhol & Horwath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiffs’ problems of proof with respect to securities fraud do not necessarily haunt their claim of mail fraud [as a RICO predicate act] since reliance is not an element of mail fraud.”
• “[The] nexus is established by proof that the defendant has in fact committed the racketeering acts alleged, that the defendant's association, with the enterprise facilitated the commission of the acts, and that the acts had some effect on the enterprise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).