Indiana Court of Appeals· 2/26/2009
Mays v. State
Citations
- 907 N.E.2d 128
- 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 3063
- 2009 WL 1491386
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding there was little risk that a jury would place undue weight on videos replayed during deliberations because the videos had already been played in open court
- although the confidential informant (“Cl”) did not testify at trial, the digital audio/video recording of the controlled buy was admitted into evidence through the detective pursuant to the silent-witness theory
- although the confidential informant did not testify at trial, the audio/video recording of the controlled buy was admitted into evidence through the detective pursuant to the silent-witness theory
- error to send video and player to jury room without monitoring use
- although the Cl did not testify at trial, the recording of the controlled buy was admitted under the silent-witness theory; the detective testified that he personally prepared the audio/video recording equipment and then removed the equipment from the Cl immediately after the controlled buy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bailey, Barnes, Mathias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-05-26· cited 40×
- Wise v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-02-13· cited 23×
- Ashley N. McFall v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2017-02-22· cited 15×
- James v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2013-12-12· cited 11×
- Marvin Beville v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2017-03-17· cited 7×
- Marvin Beville v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-03-29· cited 1×
- Jerome Sheckles v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-01-09
- Lyle D. Tucker v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-01-29
- Ralph Martinez v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-10-25
- Homer T. Richards v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-10-25
- Deshawn C. Howard v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-06-22
- Christopher Stichter v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-06-19
- Joshua Adam Anderson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-07-31
- Dwight Teague v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-11-19
- Kevin Ladell Robinson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-10-02
- James Henry Stewart, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-11-20
- Harry L Torrence, II v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2023-09-27
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McHenry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-01-06· cited 491×
- Thacker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-04-16· cited 90×
- Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Local 1942, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-CioSeventh Circuit· 1989-02-28· cited 81×
- Schlomer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-11-07· cited 74×
- Bouye v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-07-20· cited 56×
- Bergner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1979-12-12· cited 53×
- Edwards v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-01-18· cited 43×
- State v. LloydIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-12-15· cited 26×
- Stokes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-01-22· cited 21×
- Irwin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-03-19· cited 17×
- Goodrich v. Indiana Michigan Power Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-02-25· cited 14×
- Allison v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-08-31· cited 8×
- State v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-12-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.