Schlomer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prosecutor’s improper vouching did not constitute reversible error where the prosecutor withdrew his opinion and the trial court admonished the jury to disregard the prosecutor’s statement
• involving a defendant’s “motion to compel disclosure of the identity and location of the confidential informant”
• finding error in the prosecutor telling jury that he believed a police officer’s testimony
• “[i]t is improper for the prosecutor to make an argument which takes the form of personally vouching for the witness”
• prosecutor’s statement, “I believe Detective McGee when he tell[s] us what happened,” held improper
• discussing the \overwhelming evidence\ against the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).