Skip to main content

Bergner v. State

Citations

  • 397 N.E.2d 1012
  • 73 Ind. Dec. 1
  • 1979 Ind. App. LEXIS 1466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring proof that photograph was not altered and suggesting other non-mandatory guidelines for admission of photographs under silent witness theory
  • requiring proof that photograph was not altered and suggesting other non-mandatory guidelines for admission of photographs under silent witness theory
  • declining to “lay down extensive, absolute foundation requirements” because “[ejvery photograph [or other recording], the context in which it was taken, and its use at trial will be different in some respect”
  • declining to “lay down extensive, absolute foundation requirements” because “[e]very photograph [or other recording], the context in which it was taken, and its use at trial will be different in some respect”
  • photograph of defendant sodomizing his four-year-old daughter
  • photograph of defendant sodomizing his four-year-old daughter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chipman, Miller, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.