Skip to main content

James v. People

Citations

  • 60 V.I. 311
  • 2013 WL 6585638
  • 2013 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We cannot usurp the role of the jury by re-analyzing, re-evaluating, or re-weighing the evidence presented at trial, or by determining the credibility of the witnesses.”
  • “[W]e apply ‘a particularly deferential standard of review.’ ” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabret, Hodge, Swan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.