Harry L Torrence, II v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a “plausible alternative interpretation of the evidence” does not preclude an agency finding being supported by substantial evidence
• holding “decision does not withstand review because the agency decisionmaker entirely ignored relevant evidence”
• discussing several DEA decisions to continue registrations where physician cooperated with DEA investigators
• vacating an agency decision due to “a lapse of reasonable and fair decisionmaking”
• discussing several DEA decisions to continue registrations where physician cooperated with DEA investigators
• noting “Morall’s record-keeping failures occurred during a relatively brief time period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).